- Big gap between words and action leaves critical sectors falling further behind, new research from CDP, the World Benchmarking Alliance and ADEME shows.
- The world's most influential automotive companies are failing to get enough low-carbon vehicles to market, with just 7% of those sold being low-carbon.
- Just 3 of 50 electric utilities majors have targets in line with IEA’s 1.5°C warming scenario. Only Ørsted is projected to stay within its carbon budget between now and 2035.
London, 24th November 2021 - Almost all companies across the electric utilities and automotive sectors are set to exceed their 1.5°C warming scenario budgets, new findings from CDP, the World Benchmarking Alliance and ADEME show today. With COP26 now concluded and pressure mounting on businesses, these critical industries are shown to be lagging far behind where they should be on reducing emissions and their reliance on fossil fuels.
The largest study of its kind, the research ranks the most influential 50 electric utilities and 30 automotive companies on their commitments and progress on achieving a low-carbon transition, in line with the milestones for achieving net zero set out in NZE(1).
The first assessment of these critical sectors released since world governments came together at COP26 to agree to a ‘phasing down’ of fossil fuel production, it shows that both sectors continue to rely heavily on fossil fuels, with nearly all (98%) companies in the electric utilities sector and 93% of the automotive sector set to exceed their carbon budgets.
In the automotive sector, half of the companies assessed have increased the share of low-carbon vehicles they sell, but this shift is not accelerating fast enough. The key findings are:
- In 2020, only 7% of the total vehicles sold across all 30 companies were low-carbon vehicles (up from 2% in 2015). In order to be aligned with the Paris Agreement’s target of 1.5°C warming, companies should be selling 64% or more low-carbon vehicles by 2030.
- Given that the industry has only seen an increase in low-carbon sales of 5% over the past 5 years, to reach these levels we would need to see a massive 5.75% increase in low-carbon vehicle sales each year until 2030.
- In 2020, seven of the 30 most influential companies still drew less than 1% of their sales from low-carbon vehicles: Ford, Honda, Mahindra & Mahindra, Mazda, Subaru, Suzuki and Toyota.
- The five biggest companies (selling more than 5 million vehicles in 2020) – Toyota, VW, GM, Stellantis and SAIC Motor – have an important role to play in the decarbonisation of the sector. With relatively low levels of low-carbon vehicle sales compared to their size (ranging from 5.9% - 0.6%), much more needs to be done to transform their operations.
- However, transition plans are becoming more detailed and ambitious, with 23 of the 30 companies improving their transition planning since last year. Two-thirds (20 out of 30) of companies have now set targets to increase their sales of low-carbon vehicles and 11 have made financial commitments to electrification and the low-carbon transition.
- However, more ambition is needed in emissions targets. 13 of the companies have set credible targets for their scope 3 emissions, however no companies’ scope 3 targets were sufficiently ambitious to align with a 1.5°C pathway.
- The sector still has far to go on contributing to a just transition, with the average score for automotive companies at just 2.9 out of 16 on WBA’s 2021 just transition assessment.
In the electric utilities sector, the key findings are:
- Overall the companies assessed will exceed their total carbon budget by 57% up to 2035.
- Just 3 out of 50 companies (Ørsted, EDP and AES Corporation) have emissions targets that align with the IEA’s 1.5°C warming scenario. Only Ørsted is projected to stay within its carbon budget between now and 2035.
- Given their continued reliance on fossil fuels, the climate performance of 35 companies in this sector is expected to decline in the near term.
- To be fully aligned with a 1.5°C pathway, 78% of companies’ electricity generating capacity needs to come from renewables by 2030. Currently, only 8 companies are investing at these levels.
- There are no companies in the sample with a zero carbon portfolio and for 34 companies, coal accounts for more than 10% of their capacity.
- The sector has performed well on pursuing a Just Transition, with European headquartered companies demonstrating the highest levels of best practice on planning for and mitigating the social impacts of their low-carbon transition on workers, communities and affected stakeholders.
Vicky Sins, Decarbonisation and Energy Transformation Lead at WBA says, "Transforming these two critical industries will have a significant impact on the fight to drive down global emissions. With companies in these sectors lagging behind on both transition planning and in reducing net emissions, we need investors, governments, civil society and other actors to engage with these keystone businesses and hold them accountable for the gaps between ambition & performance right now, and not in the future. Poor performance of the most influential automotive and electric utilities companies could undermine the legacy that COP26 sets out."
Nicolette Bartlett, Chief Impact Officer at CDP says, “To stay on track for safe levels of warming, we need to see massive strides from both of these critical sectors. At present, we’re simply not seeing change happen fast enough. The automotive sector has only increased its low-carbon vehicle share by 5% over the past five years - that kind of progress is not going to get us where we need to be by 2030. Likewise, the fact that only 8 out of 50 companies are currently investing enough in low-carbon tech to align with a 1.5°C warming scenario is a red flag for the entire industry. Companies must increase ambition and deliver against climate transition plans or it will prove disastrous for their businesses and for our overall climate efforts.”
“While policy makers are wondering if, when and how to address the question of companies’ transition plans alignment with 1.5°C, these updated benchmarks prove once again that the world can’t only rely on private sector’s commitments to reach planetary carbon neutrality. Challenging mandatory schemes like the European Union’s taxonomy, enlightened choices from the financial sector and civil society pressure should accelerate actual transition plans implementation”. Said Romain Poivet, coordinator of the ACT Initiative at ADEME.
These benchmarks are the latest iterations in a series of analyses from CDP, WBA & ADEME tracking the progress of the sectors (the second iteration of the electric utilities sector and the third of the automotive). Earlier this year, the first Oil and Gas Benchmark was also published, as well as the Just Transition assessment of 180 companies in high-emitting sectors, launched at COP26.
-Ends-Notes to editor
For more information or exclusive interviews, please contact:
- Kristiana Papi, di:ga communications, tel. +44 (0)7572382252, [email protected]
- Maddy Bravery, CDP, [email protected]
Notes:
The benchmarks can be found on the following links:
Automotive: https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/automotive/
Electric Utilities: https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/electric-utilities/
Previous editions of these benchmarks:
Automotive: 2019 and 2020 (https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/automotive/)
Electric Utilities: 2020 (https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/publication/electric-utilities/)
(1)This latest benchmark from the World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA), alongside partners CDP and ADEME, builds on company scores in previous years, scoring private, state-owned and publicly listed companies using CDP’s and ADEME’s Assessing low Carbon Transmission (ACT) methodology. The benchmarks measure companies against key milestones from the 1.5°C scenario - the most ambitious emissions reduction plan proposed by the Paris Agreement, using the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) Net Zero Emissions by 2050 scenario.
ABOUT WBA: The World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA) is a non-profit organisation that assesses and ranks the world’s most influential companies’ performance on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We publish publicly available and free benchmarks that inform and empower business leaders and investors, as well as governments, civil society and other key stakeholders. WBA insights aim to serve as an accountability mechanism, incentivising companies to become a successful driver of change and deliver on the SDGs. Together with our 260+ Alliance, we are building a movement that enables transparent dialogue, and ultimately action towards a more inclusive, fair and sustainable world.
ABOUT CDP:
CDP is a global non-profit that runs the world’s environmental disclosure system for companies, cities, states and regions. Founded in 2000 and working with more than 590 investors with over $110 trillion in assets, CDP pioneered using capital markets and corporate procurement to motivate companies to disclose their environmental impacts, and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, safeguard water resources and protect forests. Over 14,000 organizations around the world disclosed data through CDP in 2021, including more than 13,000 companies worth over 64% of global market capitalization, and over 1,100 cities, states and regions. Fully TCFD aligned, CDP holds the largest environmental database in the world, and CDP scores are widely used to drive investment and procurement decisions towards a zero carbon, sustainable and resilient economy. CDP is a founding member of the Science Based Targets initiative, We Mean Business Coalition, The Investor Agenda and the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative. Visit cdp.net or follow us @CDP to find out more.
About ACT: ACT is a joint voluntary initiative recognised by the UNFCCC secretariat Global Climate Agenda and supported by the French government. It aims at driving companies’ climate actions to align their strategies with low-carbon pathways. ACT provides an accountability framework to assess how companies’ strategies and transition plans contribute to the Paris Agreement mitigation goals. ACT takes an integrated and forward-looking approach to measure quantitatively and qualitatively decarbonisation performance across the past, present and future focusing on the major emissions sources in the business value chain. Publicly available assessment methodologies are sector specific responding to each sector’s own transition challenges. A complementary method that equips less mature businesses to develop robust low carbon strategies and implement relevant transition plans.
About ADEME: ADEME – the French Agency for Ecological Transition is proactively engaged in climate change mitigation and adaptation as well as resources deterioration prevention. We involve citizens, the private sector and local authorities, by giving them the means to progress towards a low carbon, more frugal, just and harmonious society. We advise, facilitate and support with projects funding, from research to solutions transfer, in all areas from energy, air quality, circular economy, waste, etc. We provide expertise and prospective advisory services to government bodies and the public at large, to enable them to establish and consolidate their environmental action
About GlobalData:
GlobalData helps its clients understand how their investing and financing activities will be exposed to climate risk by projecting the output of the world’s energy sector assets. To discover how GlobalData can help you better understand the complete energy sector, contact Andrew Leighton [[email protected]]
Rank | Company | ACT rating | ||
1 | Tesla Motors, Inc. | 12.7 | B | + |
2 | Renault | 9 | B | + |
3 | Volkswagen AG | 10.7 | C | = |
4 | BYD | 5.8 | B | - |
5 | BMW AG | 9.6 | C | = |
6 | General Motors Company | 9 | C | = |
7 | Daimler AG | 8.8 | C | = |
8 | Saic Motor Corporation | 8.3 | C | = |
9 | Guangzhou Automobile Group Co. Ltd | 7.9 | C | = |
10 | Tata Motors | 7.3 | C | = |
- | Toyota Motor Corporation | 7.3 | C | = |
12 | Great Wall Motor Company (H) | 7.1 | C | = |
13 | Ford Motor Company | 6.1 | C | = |
14 | BAIC Motor Corporation Ltd | 5.4 | C | = |
15 | Stellantis N.V. | 5.3 | D | + |
16 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | 7.2 | D | - |
17 | Hyundai Motor Co | 6.6 | D | - |
18 | Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Co Ltd | 5.5 | D | = |
19 | Kia Motors Corp | 5.9 | D | - |
20 | Geely Automobile Holdings | 5.6 | D | - |
21 | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | 5.3 | D | - |
22 | Mitsubishi Motors Corporation | 5.2 | D | - |
- | FAW Jiefang Group Co Ltd | 5.2 | D | - |
- | Dongfeng Motor Group | 5.2 | D | - |
25 | Mahindra & Mahindra | 4.6 | D | - |
26 | Mazda Motor Corporation | 3 | D | - |
27 | SUBARU CORPORATION | 3.3 | E | - |
28 | Chongqing Changan Automobile Company Limited | 3.2 | E | - |
29 | Suzuki Motor Corporation | 3 | E | - |
30 | Chery Automobile Co. Ltd | 2 | E | - |
Rank | Company | ACT rating |
| |
1 | Ørsted | 18.5 | A | + |
2 | SSE | 14.4 | A | = |
3 | E.ON SE | 12.1 | A | = |
4 | Vattenfall Group | 15.6 | B | + |
5 | EDP - Energias de Portugal S.A. | 15.4 | B | + |
6 | ENEL SpA | 14.2 | B | + |
7 | Iberdrola SA | 13.1 | B | = |
8 | EDF | 11.1 | B | + |
- | ENGIE | 11.1 | B | + |
10 | Xcel Energy Inc. | 9.9 | B | + |
11 | CLP Holdings Limited | 10.1 | B | = |
12 | Exelon Corporation | 9.3 | B | - |
13 | Centrais Eletricas Brasileiras S/A (ELETROBRAS) | 11.5 | C | - |
14 | Dominion Energy | 9.7 | C | = |
15 | EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG | 10.3 | C | - |
16 | NextEra Energy, Inc. | 10.1 | C | - |
17 | American Electric Power Company, Inc. | 9.5 | C | - |
18 | Duke Energy Corporation | 7.7 | C | = |
19 | Vistra Corp. | 8.5 | C | - |
20 | The Southern Company | 7.8 | C | - |
21 | RWE AG | 10.8 | D | = |
22 | The AES Corporation | 10.3 | D | = |
23 | State Power Investment Corporation | 6.0 | C | - |
24 | CEZ | 10.6 | D | - |
25 | Tohoku Electric Power Co., Inc. | 6.8 | D | - |
26 | The Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Inc (TEPCO) | 6.1 | D | - |
27 | China Three Gorges Corporation | 5.0 | D | = |
28 | Origin Energy | 5.8 | D | - |
29 | The Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc. | 10.7 | E | - |
30 | PLN | 5.6 | D | - |
31 | Saudi Electricity | 5.4 | D | - |
32 | PG&E Corporation | 5.2 | D | - |
33 | Kyushu Electric Power Co Inc | 5.0 | D | - |
34 | The Chugoku Electric Power Company | 4.5 | D | - |
35 | Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc. | 4.2 | D | - |
36 | Fortum Oyj | 8.3 | E | - |
37 | China Huadian Corporation | 2.7 | D | - |
38 | Tenaga Nasional | 2.6 | D | - |
- | China Datang Corp Renewable Power Co Ltd | 2.6 | D | - |
40 | Taiwan Power Company | 2.2 | D | - |
41 | AGL Energy | 6.6 | E | - |
- | China Energy Investment Corp Ltd | 1.6 | D | - |
43 | Comision Federal de Electricidad | 1.2 | D | - |
44 | INTER RAO UES OAO | 4.7 | E | - |
45 | Eskom | 3.9 | E | - |
46 | Korea Electric Power Corp | 3.7 | E | - |
47 | NTPC Ltd | 2.8 | E | - |
48 | Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand | 2.7 | E | - |
- | China Huaneng Group | 2.7 | E | - |
50 | Egyptian Electricity Holding Company (EEHC) | 1.1 | E | - |